To say "Universe exists" without reference, is like to say " A car is moving" without reference, both have no meaning.
Every event in space-time exists with respect to another point in the same space time, but considering all space-time points (Universe) and thought in its existence, we would discover that Universe existence needs a reference, otherwise, it would has no meaning!!. This reference mustn't have any need to any reference for it existence meaning. The existence reference must be independent in its existence of any other existence in the Universe or/and the Universe existence as a whole. This reference must be not inside universe (nor outside it!!) and it gives every thing its existence meaning from referencing it to the reference existence. This reference is GOD, the creator of Universe. No Universe's existence is possible without God, but God's existence is possible without universe!
Saturday, October 31, 2009
Monday, October 19, 2009
Is life physical phenomenon?
As Atheism denies the role of soul in life, it considers the life emergence on earth as just physical phenomenon, and they claim that the living organism have all its living from only the physical world and no ingredients from the "metaphysical" world, as they deny the "metaphysical world as whole.
Now assume that we have fed a quantum simulator operating on a quantum computer all single atoms information + (atom-atom) interaction information + boundary conditions and initial condition for the whole system.
Now we have the total human body is macroscopic system, so its epsi function would collapse on merely 1 scenario, so the question now:
Can we use a quantum simulator installed on a quantum computer to know what is the behavior of this human after ,say, 1 hour?!
Now assume that we have fed a quantum simulator operating on a quantum computer all single atoms information + (atom-atom) interaction information + boundary conditions and initial condition for the whole system.
Now we have the total human body is macroscopic system, so its epsi function would collapse on merely 1 scenario, so the question now:
Can we use a quantum simulator installed on a quantum computer to know what is the behavior of this human after ,say, 1 hour?!
Sunday, October 18, 2009
"God of gaps" is very big myth
"God of gaps" is very big myth for both science and religion.
Let us consider just event A , like falling apple from a tree, when Newton has discovered the mathematical relation between M (earth mass), r (distance from center of earth) and G (gravitational constant) and the rate of change of falling apple momentum. The Question now.. Does Newton provide any explanation of what happened? If you asked him he would say, it Earth attracted the apple but I don't have an idea about "why" it attracted the apple!!
Let us consider just event A , like falling apple from a tree, when Newton has discovered the mathematical relation between M (earth mass), r (distance from center of earth) and G (gravitational constant) and the rate of change of falling apple momentum. The Question now.. Does Newton provide any explanation of what happened? If you asked him he would say, it Earth attracted the apple but I don't have an idea about "why" it attracted the apple!!
Let us look from another side, if one religious man has the myth of "God of gaps", he would say, God has pulled the apple toward the earth, so I don't need science to tell me the reason of apple fall!!
That's right, but, what would you gain if you know just that God is the reason of every event happens according to his will??!! You have no idea about the description of the action of God in quantitative manner.
So religion give the answer "why" the apple falls down not up, the answer is that this is God's design, but God himself orders people ,in Islam for instance, to explore world to know "how" universe runs based on his willing "why".
==================================
This big myth either at the religious side or scientific side came from misunderstanding the difference between the behavior description (science rule) and the behavior reason (religion rule).
==================================
Conclusively, physics laws is just math documentation of "great will" does whatever it wants in the universe but does it in constant manner to stabilize universe and ease our use for it.
That's right, but, what would you gain if you know just that God is the reason of every event happens according to his will??!! You have no idea about the description of the action of God in quantitative manner.
So religion give the answer "why" the apple falls down not up, the answer is that this is God's design, but God himself orders people ,in Islam for instance, to explore world to know "how" universe runs based on his willing "why".
==================================
This big myth either at the religious side or scientific side came from misunderstanding the difference between the behavior description (science rule) and the behavior reason (religion rule).
==================================
Conclusively, physics laws is just math documentation of "great will" does whatever it wants in the universe but does it in constant manner to stabilize universe and ease our use for it.
Strong anthropic principle
Strong anthropic principle is really good argument for creation, moreover its refuting trials are not that good. "According to Sir: Martin Rees, there are 6 quantities that are tuned in our universe to adapt life. Epsilon, N, Omega, Lambda, Q and D.
He invented a smart idea to refute creation though these six parameters are tuned for life. He suggested that there are infinite universes that have different combination of these parameters, but it is natural that the only detectable universe is ours because the rest has no life to detect!!
The problem here is that atheists see that detectability and falsifiability is the basis of existence evidence, and they omitted God existence based on them. So what about Sir.Rees? Why does not he apply the two principle on his infinite universes, so he is in contradiction, to avoid God existence he had to assume existence of infinite non detectable unfalsifiable entities!!"
Moreover, taking into account the hypothesis of God versus of infinite number of universes, we find that they equal from being not falsifiable, but the hypothesis of God much more satisfactory for Occam's razor than the multiple universe.
Actually what is more important that the same argument which is taken against theists when taking about God existence, namely, falsifiability, is used to reject God existence, it is double standard logic.
Conclusion:
1-Strong Anthropic Principle is a very strong sign for design argument.
2-Universe is created and made suitable for intelligent life to live in.
Qur'an: 31:20 " Do ye not see that Allah has subjected to your (use) all things in the heavens and on earth, and has made his bounties flow to you in exceeding measure, (both) seen and unseen? Yet there are among men those who dispute about Allah, without knowledge and without guidance, and without a Book to enlighten them! "
He invented a smart idea to refute creation though these six parameters are tuned for life. He suggested that there are infinite universes that have different combination of these parameters, but it is natural that the only detectable universe is ours because the rest has no life to detect!!
The problem here is that atheists see that detectability and falsifiability is the basis of existence evidence, and they omitted God existence based on them. So what about Sir.Rees? Why does not he apply the two principle on his infinite universes, so he is in contradiction, to avoid God existence he had to assume existence of infinite non detectable unfalsifiable entities!!"
Moreover, taking into account the hypothesis of God versus of infinite number of universes, we find that they equal from being not falsifiable, but the hypothesis of God much more satisfactory for Occam's razor than the multiple universe.
Actually what is more important that the same argument which is taken against theists when taking about God existence, namely, falsifiability, is used to reject God existence, it is double standard logic.
Conclusion:
1-Strong Anthropic Principle is a very strong sign for design argument.
2-Universe is created and made suitable for intelligent life to live in.
Qur'an: 31:20 " Do ye not see that Allah has subjected to your (use) all things in the heavens and on earth, and has made his bounties flow to you in exceeding measure, (both) seen and unseen? Yet there are among men those who dispute about Allah, without knowledge and without guidance, and without a Book to enlighten them! "
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
