God, "I" and Universe

The Nature of Self: Am I My Brain?

"I" feel through my brain—feeling cells' stimulation—but am "I" "my" brain?

Even "my" brain (and my body) is perceived by "me." It is a vicious loop, except for the possibility that "I" am neither "my" brain nor "my" body. "I" can feel "my" body, then "I" must be distinct from "my" body.

If you think "I" were merely some complicated system of atoms, NO—this is "my" body, but not "me."

"I" feel information that "I" perceive as "visual info," "audio info," "smell info"... But at the end, "I" perceive an information stream which is the universe for "me." But who is the information stream's author and streamer? Definitely, it is not "me." "I" feel things "I" don't know.

Some entity must be the author of the information stream "I" feel—who authored the information and streams it! Is he God?

---

"I" die when "my" body can't communicate with the usual information you feel (if you're still alive), but "I" am still feeling another type of information stream.

---

Finally: It seems neither "me" nor God is a part of the universe (information stream).

Existence Equation:
Existence = "me" + universe (information stream, including my body) + God (author and streamer of information stream/universe)

Question to, and ,favor from, Atheists!!

A Challenge to Atheist Scientists: Design an Intelligent Universe

Since you see there is no design or intelligence—and consequently no designer (God)—put in our universe, I have a request and a question:

---

1. The Request:

Would you please ask a group of the most brilliant atheist scientists in the world to design a really elegant universe that bears "true design" and "high intelligence"? Just do that on a theoretical basis, or do a simulation for it to see how the smart universe works—not the dumb one we live in!

If they succeed, we can use the energy in this universe in designing another smart universe instead of our dumb one!

---

2. The Question:

I wonder, why have our scientists failed until now to completely understand how this stupid, not-designed, dumb universe works? Even now, after about 350 years from the modern scientific revolution and 100 years from special relativity and the photoelectric effect experiment, can't our brilliant scientists know in detail how this dummy, stupid existence—that is not designed at all—works?

---

Have you ever asked yourself this question before?

God, true science, Universe and true religion

Science and Religion: An Integration

True science doesn't contradict true religion; on the contrary, they integrate.

The more you know about the Universe (science), the more you understand the greatness of its Governor. This helps you become more religious—to thank God for making you a part of His Universe. Moreover, researching the Universe more helps you become more religious.

The more you know about God (religion), the more you understand the greatness of His Universe. This helps you become more scientific—to discover and use this wonderful Universe. Moreover, understanding religion more helps you become more scientific.

The design of the universe

George Smoot: Nobel Prize Winner in Physics

George Fitzgerald Smoot III (born February 20, 1945) is an American astrophysicist, cosmologist, and Nobel Prize in Physics laureate, as well as a $1 million TV quiz show prize winner. He won the Nobel Prize in 2006 for his work on COBE with John C. Mather that led to the measurement "...of the black body form and anisotropy of the cosmic microwave background radiation."

This work helped further the Big Bang theory of the universe using the Cosmic Background Explorer Satellite (COBE). According to the Nobel Prize committee, "the COBE project can also be regarded as the starting point for cosmology as a precision science." Smoot donated his share of the Nobel Prize money, less travel costs, to a charitable foundation.

He is a professor of physics at the University of California, Berkeley. In 2003, he was awarded the Einstein Medal.

---

References

1. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c64Aia4XE1Y

2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Smoot

Elements of existence!!

Existence as Information: A Three-Entity Model

I consider existence to be information—nothing else. If I assumed that I have a brain, as they told me, you could make me feel anything you want by stimulating my brain cells in the proper way.

For Me, Existence Has Three Entities:

1. "I" (whatever its meaning)—I who perceive what I think is "in" physically!

2. Stream of Information that "I" feel... you call it the universe!

3. Some Entity who is the source of information and who makes it a streaming projection on "I."

I call this entity GOD.

I am sure that I am not the one who puts this streaming information in front of "I." I have no idea about the information that will come in the next picoseconds, and I am sure that no information is self-circulating! So it must have a source...

Universe & Google !!!

The Google Company Analogy: Why Atheism Is Illogical

When you look around and see everything is in harmony and persistence with time, and it is apparent with some little thinking that the entire universe appears to be governed, I see that any normal, healthy brain should ask: Who is governing that huge system? And who is managing it?

It would be extremely ridiculous if I entered Google company and said, "Mmmm, it seems that Google has no owner or manager!" Then one employee at Google documented how this huge company is running in an amazing way and wrote a huge document that describes this impressive discipline that governs everything within the company.

The employee knows very well that he is just doing documentation. Suddenly, a foolish employee came to him and said, "Oh, you are brilliant! I now understand why we don't see the CEO and manager of the company—because your document is the CEO and manager! Your brilliant document is a genius, so there is no manager or CEO. Yeah! We now know 'the reason' for everything happening in Google, and Google is self-managed by laws in those papers. So why stick to an 'old-fashioned' idea that most low IQ employees are adopting—that there is a manager? Why should we believe in his existence when we haven't seen him?"

"No, no! We are scientists. We know now the 'reason' for everything, and those 'low score' employees are definitely in that miserable state because they think there is a real manager!"

So let them believe that they will be rewarded after the next tornado that is expected to hit the company and destroy it. They are so low IQ... they believe that if they do well at work, not only will they receive a good salary, but they will also get a reward from their claimed "unseen" manager. How miserable they are!

Are You an Atheist? If Yes, Then:

You have convinced yourself that the documentations that described how the universe is governed in the past—this documentation (laws of physics)—have now been promoted to a new position (Governor of the universe's behavior) after you IGNORED the real Governor just because you don't smell Him!

THIS IS CALLED CIRCULAR LOGIC:

"Laws are descriptions of behavior, but they are NOT 'the reason' for the behavior they describe."

Falsification test is not valid for so clear entities:(Too clear to need proof!!)

Examples That Definitely Exist but Are Not Falsifiable

1. Statements of mathematical axioms.

2. Universe (as a whole) existence.

3. One's own existence relative to himself.

4. You are awake, not asleep and dreaming.

So when someone tells me that God is not falsifiable, I can simply tell him I am feeling GOD directly through my soul—it is like your eyes when they see the sun!

The Qur'an as Evidence

Moreover, for those who are not convinced by the non-universality of falsification, God left documentation with Prophet Muhammad, named the Qur'an, that proves itself through its non-human-like way of writing. It challenges the entire world to produce just one chapter (even the shortest) like the chapters of this book, in its unique style of writing that has no common factor with intelligent creatures' way of writing. Moreover, its miraculous relevance to every place and time throughout 1,400 years, its statements of events before they happened, and time itself have proven the truth of the Qur'an.

This book has been signed by GOD. If anyone else had written it, why hasn't He objected? If it was Muhammad who wrote it, why didn't he claim that he is a God (like what Christians believe about Jesus)? So the Qur'an itself is falsifiable, but God is not.

Does God Exist?

Bertrand Russell, although an atheist, in his book,“Why I am not a Christian”, has admitted this fact. He says that the argument centering on design, propounded by theologians to prove the existence of God, is scientifically valid Since ancient days, theologians have argued that when there is a design there must also be a designer. As we see that our world is well designed, it compels us to believe that there is a designer
======
Reference: Does God Exist?
By:Wahiduddin Khan

Strong anthropic principle is really good argument for creation

Strong anthropic principle is really good argument for creation, moreover its refuting trials are not that good.

According to Sir: Martin Rees, there are 6 quantities that are tuned in our universe to adapt life. Epsilon, N, Omega, Lambda, Q and D.
He invented a smart idea to refute creation though these six parameters are tuned for life. He suggested that there are infinite universes that have different combination of these parameters, but it is natural that the only detectable universe is ours because the rest has no life to detect!!
The problem here is that atheists see that detectability and falsifiability is the basis of existence evidence, and they omitted God existence based on them. So what about Sir.Rees? Why does not he apply the two principle on his infinite universes, so he is in contradiction, to avoid God existence he had to assume existence of infinite non detectable unfalsifiable entities!!