Tuesday, January 9, 2018

How Islamic inventors changed the world

How Islamic Inventors Changed the World

1. Coffee

The story goes that an Arab named Khalid was tending his goats in the Kaffa region of southern Ethiopia when he noticed his animals became livelier after eating a certain berry. He boiled the berries to make the first coffee. Certainly, the first record of the drink is of beans exported from Ethiopia to Yemen, where Sufis drank it to stay awake all night to pray on special occasions. By the late 15th century, it had arrived in Mecca and Turkey, from where it made its way to Venice in 1645. It was brought to England in 1650 by a Turk named Pasqua Rosee, who opened the first coffee house in Lombard Street in the City of London. The Arabic qahwa became the Turkish kahve, then the Italian caffé, and then English coffee.


2. The Camera

The ancient Greeks thought our eyes emitted rays, like a laser, which enabled us to see. The first person to realize that light enters the eye, rather than leaving it, was the 10th-century Muslim mathematician, astronomer, and physicist Ibn al-Haitham. He invented the first pin-hole camera after noticing the way light came through a hole in window shutters. The smaller the hole, the better the picture, he worked out, and set up the first Camera Obscura (from the Arab word qamara for a dark or private room). He is also credited with being the first man to shift physics from a philosophical activity to an experimental one.


3. Chess

A form of chess was played in ancient India, but the game was developed into the form we know it today in Persia. From there it spread westward to Europe—where it was introduced by the Moors in Spain in the 10th century—and eastward as far as Japan. The word "rook" comes from the Persian rukh, which means chariot.


4. Parachute and Flying Machine

A thousand years before the Wright brothers, a Muslim poet, astronomer, musician, and engineer named Abbas ibn Firnas made several attempts to construct a flying machine. In 852, he jumped from the minaret of the Grand Mosque in Cordoba using a loose cloak stiffened with wooden struts. He hoped to glide like a bird. He didn't. But the cloak slowed his fall, creating what is thought to be the first parachute, and leaving him with only minor injuries. In 875, aged 70, having perfected a machine of silk and eagles' feathers, he tried again, jumping from a mountain. He flew to a significant height and stayed aloft for ten minutes but crashed on landing—concluding, correctly, that it was because he had not given his device a tail so it would stall on landing. Baghdad International Airport and a crater on the Moon are named after him.


5. Soap and Shampoo

Washing and bathing are religious requirements for Muslims, which is perhaps why they perfected the recipe for soap which we still use today. The ancient Egyptians had soap of a kind, as did the Romans, who used it more as a pomade. But it was the Arabs who combined vegetable oils with sodium hydroxide and aromatics such as thyme oil. One of the Crusaders' most striking characteristics, to Arab nostrils, was that they did not wash. Shampoo was introduced to England by a Muslim who opened Mahomed's Indian Vapour Baths on Brighton seafront in 1759 and was appointed Shampooing Surgeon to Kings George IV and William IV.


6. Distillation and Chemistry

Distillation, the means of separating liquids through differences in their boiling points, was invented around the year 800 by Islam's foremost scientist, Jabir ibn Hayyan, who transformed alchemy into chemistry, inventing many of the basic processes and apparatus still in use today—liquefaction, crystallization, distillation, purification, oxidization, evaporation, and filtration. As well as discovering sulfuric and nitric acid, he invented the alembic still, giving the world intense rosewater and other perfumes and alcoholic spirits (although drinking them is haram, or forbidden, in Islam). Ibn Hayyan emphasized systematic experimentation and was the founder of modern chemistry.


7. Crank-Shaft

The crank-shaft is a device which translates rotary into linear motion and is central to much of the machinery in the modern world, not least the internal combustion engine. One of the most important mechanical inventions in the history of humankind, it was created by an ingenious Muslim engineer called al-Jazari to raise water for irrigation. His 1206 Book of Knowledge of Ingenious Mechanical Devices shows he also invented or refined the use of valves and pistons, devised some of the first mechanical clocks driven by water and weights, and was the father of robotics. Among his 50 other inventions was the combination lock.


8. Quilting

Quilting is a method of sewing or tying two layers of cloth with a layer of insulating material in between. It is not clear whether it was invented in the Muslim world or whether it was imported there from India or China. But it certainly came to the West via the Crusaders. They saw it used by Saracen warriors, who wore straw-filled quilted canvas shirts instead of armor. As well as a form of protection, it proved an effective guard against the chafing of the Crusaders' metal armor and was an effective form of insulation—so much so that it became a cottage industry back home in colder climates such as Britain and Holland.


9. Pointed Arch and Architecture

The pointed arch so characteristic of Europe's Gothic cathedrals was an invention borrowed from Islamic architecture. It was much stronger than the rounded arch used by the Romans and Normans, thus allowing the building of bigger, higher, more complex, and grander buildings. Other borrowings from Muslim genius included ribbed vaulting, rose windows, and dome-building techniques. Europe's castles were also adapted to copy the Islamic world's—with arrow slits, battlements, a barbican, and parapets. Square towers and keeps gave way to more easily defended round ones. Henry V's castle architect was a Muslim.


10. Surgical Instruments

Many modern surgical instruments are of exactly the same design as those devised in the 10th century by a Muslim surgeon called al-Zahrawi. His scalpels, bone saws, forceps, fine scissors for eye surgery, and many of the 200 instruments he devised are recognizable to a modern surgeon. It was he who discovered that catgut used for internal stitches dissolves away naturally (a discovery he made when his monkey ate his lute strings) and that it can also be used to make medicine capsules. In the 13th century, another Muslim medic named Ibn Nafis described the circulation of the blood, 300 years before William Harvey discovered it. Muslim doctors also invented anesthetics of opium and alcohol mixes and developed hollow needles to suck cataracts from eyes in a technique still used today.


11. Windmill

The windmill was invented in 634 for a Persian caliph and was used to grind corn and draw up water for irrigation. In the vast deserts of Arabia, when the seasonal streams ran dry, the only source of power was the wind, which blew steadily from one direction for months. Mills had six or twelve sails covered in fabric or palm leaves. It was 500 years before the first windmill was seen in Europe.


12. Inoculation

The technique of inoculation was not invented by Jenner and Pasteur but was devised in the Muslim world and brought to Europe from Turkey by the wife of the English ambassador to Istanbul in 1724. Children in Turkey were vaccinated with cowpox to fight the deadly smallpox at least 50 years before the West discovered it.


13. Fountain Pen

The fountain pen was invented for the Sultan of Egypt in 953 after he demanded a pen which would not stain his hands or clothes. It held ink in a reservoir and, as with modern pens, fed ink to the nib by a combination of gravity and capillary action.


14. Numerals and Algebra

The system of numbering in use all around the world is probably Indian in origin, but the style of the numerals is Arabic and first appears in print in the work of the Muslim mathematicians al-Khwarizmi and al-Kindi around 825. Algebra was named after al-Khwarizmi's book, Al-Jabr wa-al-Muqabilah, much of whose contents are still in use. The work of Muslim math scholars was imported into Europe 300 years later by the Italian mathematician Fibonacci. Algorithms and much of the theory of trigonometry came from the Muslim world. And al-Kindi's discovery of frequency analysis rendered all the codes of the ancient world solvable and created the basis of modern cryptology.


15. Three-Course Meal

Ali ibn Nafi, known by his nickname of Ziryab (Blackbird), came from Iraq to Cordoba in the 9th century and brought with him the concept of the three-course meal—soup, followed by fish or meat, then fruit and nuts. He also introduced crystal glasses (which had been invented after experiments with rock crystal by Abbas ibn Firnas—see No. 4).


16. Carpets

Carpets were regarded as part of Paradise by medieval Muslims, thanks to their advanced weaving techniques, new tinctures from Islamic chemistry, and highly developed sense of pattern and arabesque, which were the basis of Islam's non-representational art. In contrast, Europe's floors were distinctly earthly, not to say earthy, until Arabian and Persian carpets were introduced. In England, as Erasmus recorded, floors were "covered in rushes, occasionally renewed, but so imperfectly that the bottom layer is left undisturbed, sometimes for 20 years, harboring expectoration, vomiting, the leakage of dogs and men, ale droppings, scraps of fish, and other abominations not fit to be mentioned." Carpets, unsurprisingly, caught on quickly.


17. Cheque

The modern cheque comes from the Arabic saqq, a written vow to pay for goods when they were delivered, to avoid money having to be transported across dangerous terrain. In the 9th century, a Muslim businessman could cash a cheque in China drawn on his bank in Baghdad.


18. Earth as a Sphere

By the 9th century, many Muslim scholars took it for granted that the Earth was a sphere. The proof, said astronomer Ibn Hazm, "is that the Sun is always vertical to a particular spot on Earth." It was 500 years before that realization dawned on Galileo. The calculations of Muslim astronomers were so accurate that in the 9th century they reckoned the Earth's circumference to be 40,253.4 km—less than 200 km out. The scholar al-Idrisi took a globe depicting the world to the court of King Roger of Sicily in 1139.


19. Gunpowder for Military Use

Though the Chinese invented saltpeter gunpowder and used it in their fireworks, it was the Arabs who worked out that it could be purified using potassium nitrate for military use. Muslim incendiary devices terrified the Crusaders. By the 15th century, they had invented both a rocket, which they called a "self-moving and combusting egg," and a torpedo—a self-propelled pear-shaped bomb with a spear at the front which impaled itself in enemy ships and then blew up.


20. Gardens

Medieval Europe had kitchen and herb gardens, but it was the Arabs who developed the idea of the garden as a place of beauty and meditation. The first royal pleasure gardens in Europe were opened in 11th-century Muslim Spain. Flowers which originated in Muslim gardens include the carnation and the tulip.


References

1. http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/how-islamic-inventors-changed-the-world-469452.html

2. "1001 Inventions: Discover the Muslim Heritage in Our World" is a new exhibition which began a nationwide tour this week. It is currently at the Science Museum in Manchester. For more information, go to www.1001inventions.com.

Saturday, December 19, 2009

What is reality?

Real vs. Not Real: The Nature of Material Reality

A lot of people talk about "real" and "not real" as if it is something easy. They ask for proof of God as if they already have proof of the universe and its nature! Materialism fails in our modern philosophy of science—there is no sharp barrier between physics and metaphysics.

It is impossible to differentiate the real from its perception! The entire universe, in the end, is composed of perceived ideas and information. The source of these ideas is GOD. So, no proof can be done for anything just because it is "material." The entire universe is just a stream of information relative to your consciousness, and this information must have a source which is NOT your consciousness—because you have no idea what you will see in the near future. So the information must have a source which is not part of directly perceived information. But GOD is the one who presents the universal information on your consciousness screen.

All we can know is that we have renamed the information we perceive (seen, smelled, heard, touched, and tasted) as "material." It is just a convention, but the reality is they are all information with different flavors to our souls. Our body is a part of the informational universe, so we can't be our bodies. We are using them as the screen on which God presents His interactive presentation (the universe).

Thursday, November 26, 2009

God, "I" and Universe

The Nature of Self: Am I My Brain?

"I" feel through my brain—feeling cells' stimulation—but am "I" "my" brain?

Even "my" brain (and my body) is perceived by "me." It is a vicious loop, except for the possibility that "I" am neither "my" brain nor "my" body. "I" can feel "my" body, then "I" must be distinct from "my" body.

If you think "I" were merely some complicated system of atoms, NO—this is "my" body, but not "me."

"I" feel information that "I" perceive as "visual info," "audio info," "smell info"... But at the end, "I" perceive an information stream which is the universe for "me." But who is the information stream's author and streamer? Definitely, it is not "me." "I" feel things "I" don't know.

Some entity must be the author of the information stream "I" feel—who authored the information and streams it! Is he God?


"I" die when "my" body can't communicate with the usual information you feel (if you're still alive), but "I" am still feeling another type of information stream.


Finally: It seems neither "me" nor God is a part of the universe (information stream).

Existence Equation:
Existence = "me" + universe (information stream, including my body) + God (author and streamer of information stream/universe)

Thursday, November 19, 2009

Question to, and ,favor from, Atheists!!

A Challenge to Atheist Scientists: Design an Intelligent Universe

Since you see there is no design or intelligence—and consequently no designer (God)—put in our universe, I have a request and a question:


1. The Request:

Would you please ask a group of the most brilliant atheist scientists in the world to design a really elegant universe that bears "true design" and "high intelligence"? Just do that on a theoretical basis, or do a simulation for it to see how the smart universe works—not the dumb one we live in!

If they succeed, we can use the energy in this universe in designing another smart universe instead of our dumb one!


2. The Question:

I wonder, why have our scientists failed until now to completely understand how this stupid, not-designed, dumb universe works? Even now, after about 350 years from the modern scientific revolution and 100 years from special relativity and the photoelectric effect experiment, can't our brilliant scientists know in detail how this dummy, stupid existence—that is not designed at all—works?


Have you ever asked yourself this question before?

Friday, November 13, 2009

God, true science, Universe and true religion

Science and Religion: An Integration

True science doesn't contradict true religion; on the contrary, they integrate.

The more you know about the Universe (science), the more you understand the greatness of its Governor. This helps you become more religious—to thank God for making you a part of His Universe. Moreover, researching the Universe more helps you become more religious.

The more you know about God (religion), the more you understand the greatness of His Universe. This helps you become more scientific—to discover and use this wonderful Universe. Moreover, understanding religion more helps you become more scientific.

Tuesday, November 10, 2009

The design of the universe

George Smoot: Nobel Prize Winner in Physics

George Fitzgerald Smoot III (born February 20, 1945) is an American astrophysicist, cosmologist, and Nobel Prize in Physics laureate, as well as a $1 million TV quiz show prize winner. He won the Nobel Prize in 2006 for his work on COBE with John C. Mather that led to the measurement "...of the black body form and anisotropy of the cosmic microwave background radiation."

This work helped further the Big Bang theory of the universe using the Cosmic Background Explorer Satellite (COBE). According to the Nobel Prize committee, "the COBE project can also be regarded as the starting point for cosmology as a precision science." Smoot donated his share of the Nobel Prize money, less travel costs, to a charitable foundation.

He is a professor of physics at the University of California, Berkeley. In 2003, he was awarded the Einstein Medal.


References

1. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c64Aia4XE1Y

2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Smoot

Saturday, November 7, 2009

Elements of existence!!

Existence as Information: A Three-Entity Model

I consider existence to be information—nothing else. If I assumed that I have a brain, as they told me, you could make me feel anything you want by stimulating my brain cells in the proper way.

For Me, Existence Has Three Entities:

1. "I" (whatever its meaning)—I who perceive what I think is "in" physically!

2. Stream of Information that "I" feel... you call it the universe!

3. Some Entity who is the source of information and who makes it a streaming projection on "I."

I call this entity GOD.

I am sure that I am not the one who puts this streaming information in front of "I." I have no idea about the information that will come in the next picoseconds, and I am sure that no information is self-circulating! So it must have a source...

Friday, November 6, 2009

Universe & Google !!!

The Google Company Analogy: Why Atheism Is Illogical

When you look around and see everything is in harmony and persistence with time, and it is apparent with some little thinking that the entire universe appears to be governed, I see that any normal, healthy brain should ask: Who is governing that huge system? And who is managing it?

It would be extremely ridiculous if I entered Google company and said, "Mmmm, it seems that Google has no owner or manager!" Then one employee at Google documented how this huge company is running in an amazing way and wrote a huge document that describes this impressive discipline that governs everything within the company.

The employee knows very well that he is just doing documentation. Suddenly, a foolish employee came to him and said, "Oh, you are brilliant! I now understand why we don't see the CEO and manager of the company—because your document is the CEO and manager! Your brilliant document is a genius, so there is no manager or CEO. Yeah! We now know 'the reason' for everything happening in Google, and Google is self-managed by laws in those papers. So why stick to an 'old-fashioned' idea that most low IQ employees are adopting—that there is a manager? Why should we believe in his existence when we haven't seen him?"

"No, no! We are scientists. We know now the 'reason' for everything, and those 'low score' employees are definitely in that miserable state because they think there is a real manager!"

So let them believe that they will be rewarded after the next tornado that is expected to hit the company and destroy it. They are so low IQ... they believe that if they do well at work, not only will they receive a good salary, but they will also get a reward from their claimed "unseen" manager. How miserable they are!

Are You an Atheist? If Yes, Then:

You have convinced yourself that the documentations that described how the universe is governed in the past—this documentation (laws of physics)—have now been promoted to a new position (Governor of the universe's behavior) after you IGNORED the real Governor just because you don't smell Him!

THIS IS CALLED CIRCULAR LOGIC:

"Laws are descriptions of behavior, but they are NOT 'the reason' for the behavior they describe."

Monday, November 2, 2009

Falsification test is not valid for so clear entities:(Too clear to need proof!!)

Examples That Definitely Exist but Are Not Falsifiable

1. Statements of mathematical axioms.

2. Universe (as a whole) existence.

3. One's own existence relative to himself.

4. You are awake, not asleep and dreaming.

So when someone tells me that God is not falsifiable, I can simply tell him I am feeling GOD directly through my soul—it is like your eyes when they see the sun!

The Qur'an as Evidence

Moreover, for those who are not convinced by the non-universality of falsification, God left documentation with Prophet Muhammad, named the Qur'an, that proves itself through its non-human-like way of writing. It challenges the entire world to produce just one chapter (even the shortest) like the chapters of this book, in its unique style of writing that has no common factor with intelligent creatures' way of writing. Moreover, its miraculous relevance to every place and time throughout 1,400 years, its statements of events before they happened, and time itself have proven the truth of the Qur'an.

This book has been signed by GOD. If anyone else had written it, why hasn't He objected? If it was Muhammad who wrote it, why didn't he claim that he is a God (like what Christians believe about Jesus)? So the Qur'an itself is falsifiable, but God is not.

Does God Exist?

Bertrand Russell, although an atheist, in his book,“Why I am not a Christian”, has admitted this fact. He says that the argument centering on design, propounded by theologians to prove the existence of God, is scientifically valid Since ancient days, theologians have argued that when there is a design there must also be a designer. As we see that our world is well designed, it compels us to believe that there is a designer
======
Reference: Does God Exist?
By:Wahiduddin Khan

Strong anthropic principle is really good argument for creation

Strong anthropic principle is really good argument for creation, moreover its refuting trials are not that good.

According to Sir: Martin Rees, there are 6 quantities that are tuned in our universe to adapt life. Epsilon, N, Omega, Lambda, Q and D.
He invented a smart idea to refute creation though these six parameters are tuned for life. He suggested that there are infinite universes that have different combination of these parameters, but it is natural that the only detectable universe is ours because the rest has no life to detect!!
The problem here is that atheists see that detectability and falsifiability is the basis of existence evidence, and they omitted God existence based on them. So what about Sir.Rees? Why does not he apply the two principle on his infinite universes, so he is in contradiction, to avoid God existence he had to assume existence of infinite non detectable unfalsifiable entities!!

Saturday, October 31, 2009

God, the absolute reference of existence

To say "Universe exists" without reference, is like to say " A car is moving" without reference, both have no meaning.
Every event in space-time exists with respect to another point in the same space time, but considering all space-time points (Universe) and thought in its existence, we would discover that Universe existence needs a reference, otherwise, it would has no meaning!!. This reference mustn't have any need to any reference for it existence meaning. The existence reference must be independent in its existence of any other existence in the Universe or/and the Universe existence as a whole. This reference must be not inside universe (nor outside it!!) and it gives every thing its existence meaning from referencing it to the reference existence. This reference is GOD, the creator of Universe. No Universe's existence is possible without God, but God's existence is possible without universe!

Monday, October 19, 2009

Is life physical phenomenon?

As Atheism denies the role of soul in life, it considers the life emergence on earth as just physical phenomenon, and they claim that the living organism have all its living from only the physical world and no ingredients from the "metaphysical" world, as they deny the "metaphysical world as whole.
Now assume that we have fed a quantum simulator operating on a quantum computer all single atoms information + (atom-atom) interaction information + boundary conditions and initial condition for the whole system.
Now we have the total human body is macroscopic system, so its epsi function would collapse on merely 1 scenario, so the question now:
Can we use a quantum simulator installed on a quantum computer to know what is the behavior of this human after ,say, 1 hour?!

Sunday, October 18, 2009

"God of gaps" is very big myth

"God of gaps" is very big myth for both science and religion.
Let us consider just event A , like falling apple from a tree, when Newton has discovered the mathematical relation between M (earth mass), r (distance from center of earth) and G (gravitational constant) and the rate of change of falling apple momentum. The Question now.. Does Newton provide any explanation of what happened? If you asked him he would say, it Earth attracted the apple but I don't have an idea about "why" it attracted the apple!!
Let us look from another side, if one religious man has the myth of "God of gaps", he would say, God has pulled the apple toward the earth, so I don't need science to tell me the reason of apple fall!!
That's right, but, what would you gain if you know just that God is the reason of every event happens according to his will??!! You have no idea about the description of the action of God in quantitative manner.
So religion give the answer "why" the apple falls down not up, the answer is that this is God's design, but God himself orders people ,in Islam for instance, to explore world to know "how" universe runs based on his willing "why".
==================================
This big myth either at the religious side or scientific side came from misunderstanding the difference between the behavior description (science rule) and the behavior reason (religion rule).
==================================
Conclusively, physics laws is just math documentation of "great will" does whatever it wants in the universe but does it in constant manner to stabilize universe and ease our use for it.

Strong anthropic principle

Strong anthropic principle is really good argument for creation, moreover its refuting trials are not that good. "According to Sir: Martin Rees, there are 6 quantities that are tuned in our universe to adapt life. Epsilon, N, Omega, Lambda, Q and D.
He invented a smart idea to refute creation though these six parameters are tuned for life. He suggested that there are infinite universes that have different combination of these parameters, but it is natural that the only detectable universe is ours because the rest has no life to detect!!
The problem here is that atheists see that detectability and falsifiability is the basis of existence evidence, and they omitted God existence based on them. So what about Sir.Rees? Why does not he apply the two principle on his infinite universes, so he is in contradiction, to avoid God existence he had to assume existence of infinite non detectable unfalsifiable entities!!"

Moreover, taking into account the hypothesis of God versus of infinite number of universes, we find that they equal from being not falsifiable, but the hypothesis of God much more satisfactory for Occam's razor than the multiple universe.

Actually what is more important that the same argument which is taken against theists when taking about God existence, namely, falsifiability, is used to reject God existence, it is double standard logic.

Conclusion:
1-Strong Anthropic Principle is a very strong sign for design argument.
2-Universe is created and made suitable for intelligent life to live in.

Qur'an: 31:20 " Do ye not see that Allah has subjected to your (use) all things in the heavens and on earth, and has made his bounties flow to you in exceeding measure, (both) seen and unseen? Yet there are among men those who dispute about Allah, without knowledge and without guidance, and without a Book to enlighten them! "

Friday, February 13, 2009

GOD existence is of an axiomatic nature

GOD existence is of an axiomatic nature. I feel flood of information every second by my consciousness, I asked myself, since I am not neither the creator nor the exhibitor of this information flood, then, there must be a great creator for this continuous stream of information and also exhibit it by certain rate on my consciousness!!

Tuesday, September 30, 2008

Existence meaning:

Lot of people think that existence is energy, let us take the following imaginary example:
We have a room that contains only two masses (1kg) and (-1kg), so what is the total energy in the room? Of course it is ZERO, but can anyone deny the existence of something in the room?! No, but what is that "something"? It is the information describing the room content like the masses state, separation and their mass amounts, moreover, the information telling that their sum is Zero!!!

Another remarkable example:
When can we call something as exists? Must it be energy? What is energy? What is material? When you dream you feel a materialistic world!! right? Is that real?! Yes. But with another degree of reality abstraction level. Does x^2-1=0 solution set exist? Yes but with even more degree of reality abstraction level.

Conclusion:
Existence is information and all the universe in just an information that is interpreted by our "brain" to artificial terms like energy, momentum, ... etc.

Thursday, September 25, 2008

Common Ethics and God Existence

When one thinks why all people are in agreement that the truthful is good and the liar is bad, I find it is extremely amazing that all these dozens of people are different in language, color, race, nationality and religion but are agreeing at the same time on simple fact like "Truthful Is Good!!". There is no way for that to happen except all these people have a common factor who is not human being, otherwise they would divide into groups regarding the truth or fallacy of "Truthful Is Good" because there would be another human beings that adopt the opposite!!, what do you think? I think the reference is God who implanted this original and common value inside our unconsciousness even before we get born.

Qur'an is not contaminated

Uniquely, among all heavenly books, Qur'an was not contaminated and here is the evidence:
Qur'an preservation was not done by copying a chain a books in series way. It depended mainly of memorizing it by huge number of independent people chain who till now transfer it by memorizing and each one can not take a certificate that he/she memorized the Qur'an and can review other people memorization except he/she has continuous chain till Prophet Mohammad, and by the way the book itself was written from brain of memorizing people with two witnesses for each single memorized verse that this verse is correct, and this happened (the writing process) few years after prophet Mohammad death.

When you know that piece of information about Qur'an, I can ask you a simple question, if the Qur'an was contaminated it would be contaminated not only from single point of memorizing chains, and hence it would generated (contamination process i mean) a huge versions of Qur'an and you would find the Islamic world is divided according to the version each group think it is the right. But this is not the case.So the first assumption is wrong.

Again I say proudly it is surely uncontaminated. BTW this method of licensing the memorizing people and transferring Qur'an is called in Arabic "Tawator" and it is unique.You can say also that the referencing method has emerged to world since Muslims have done it in Islamic religion, the only religion that have references for its book.Every memorizing one has a certificate including the names of his/her chain till reaching prophet Mohammad then God.

Wednesday, September 24, 2008

Who Turned-ON Physics Laws?

Super-string theory informs us that at the moment of Big-Bang (formally, the space time origin), the physics laws collapse, so that there is physics laws at this moment!!. This result brings to mind two questions:
1- How was the behavior of the universe at this big-bang and what was governing the universe then, if there are no physics laws then?!
2- At some point, the physics laws started tom work!! so what has selected this point (it is not for sure a physical law! as there was no)?

It seems the answer of the second question is pretty clear: The one who has "turned-on" physics law must be not governed by them and must be independent on space-time! so "he" must be extraordinary entity that is not in the universe and have the will to author and turn-on the laws that is governing our universe till now. Just think in it, he is God, the creator and governor of the universe who has created it, authored the laws that is governing it, conquer the universe to follow these laws and finally maintained these laws as well as its physical constants from vanishing again or altering in random fashion.

Is there afterlife?

Most atheists believe there is no after life, just because they see the bodies of dead people vanish after death and are no more valid for being alive.
If you are aware and convinced that every statement should be falsifiable to be valid from practical point of view. So is this statement "My awareness will vanish after death" falsifiable or not? It is apparent that it is not falsifiable, right?May be one says, but also the opposite statement "My awareness will continue after death" is not falsifiable too. I say yes, this is right, so at least you don't have mental proof or disproof for afterlife. Then if you are told that you will have afterlife by a book that claims, it is from God and this claim is augmented by a lot of evidences there is no human being can author a book (Qur'an in specific), then, there is reason to believe in afterlife.

Soul Existence

Just if we have deep though regarding the following statement "I am composed from body only without any soul". Have you thought before when you say "my body", who is taking? Can your body be who is talking and say "my body"?! It seems that the answer is clearly; NO. It seems that there is "someone" not included among "body parts" is who is saying "my body". What do you think?

Monday, September 22, 2008

Universe; the wonderful symphony

When we find a wonderful symphony that admires all who hears it, it is pretty difficult to say that this beautiful symphony has came from noise, actually this has probability zero to have beauty from noise.

Super string theory informs us that universe is composed at the end of the day from extremely tiny strings that oscillate in different modes and tones and every tone for each string gives the elementary particle certain feature, like mass, charge, spin, etc ...

When we have a deep look into this extremely complicated and beautiful symphony, we find that there must be a great mind behind this symphony who has composed it. No way to escape from this fact. One can not see the British encyclopedia and jump to a conclusion that this encyclopedia with its vast amount of well written books has no author!!.So what about the whole wonderful universe, can this sophisticated design has no author?!! When one be honest with him/herself he/she must reach the same conclusion that the must be God who authored physics laws with its sophisticated form and who choses carefully the values of physical constants to build this whole universe and make it stable.

Just have fair deep thinking, you will find the wise of God in every equation discovered that are followed by whole universe in complete state of obey.