What is reality?

Real vs. Not Real: The Nature of Material Reality

A lot of people talk about "real" and "not real" as if it is something easy. They ask for proof of God as if they already have proof of the universe and its nature! Materialism fails in our modern philosophy of science—there is no sharp barrier between physics and metaphysics.

It is impossible to differentiate the real from its perception! The entire universe, in the end, is composed of perceived ideas and information. The source of these ideas is GOD. So, no proof can be done for anything just because it is "material." The entire universe is just a stream of information relative to your consciousness, and this information must have a source which is NOT your consciousness—because you have no idea what you will see in the near future. So the information must have a source which is not part of directly perceived information. But GOD is the one who presents the universal information on your consciousness screen.

All we can know is that we have renamed the information we perceive (seen, smelled, heard, touched, and tasted) as "material." It is just a convention, but the reality is they are all information with different flavors to our souls. Our body is a part of the informational universe, so we can't be our bodies. We are using them as the screen on which God presents His interactive presentation (the universe).

God, "I" and Universe

The Nature of Self: Am I My Brain?

"I" feel through my brain—feeling cells' stimulation—but am "I" "my" brain?

Even "my" brain (and my body) is perceived by "me." It is a vicious loop, except for the possibility that "I" am neither "my" brain nor "my" body. "I" can feel "my" body, then "I" must be distinct from "my" body.

If you think "I" were merely some complicated system of atoms, NO—this is "my" body, but not "me."

"I" feel information that "I" perceive as "visual info," "audio info," "smell info"... But at the end, "I" perceive an information stream which is the universe for "me." But who is the information stream's author and streamer? Definitely, it is not "me." "I" feel things "I" don't know.

Some entity must be the author of the information stream "I" feel—who authored the information and streams it! Is he God?

---

"I" die when "my" body can't communicate with the usual information you feel (if you're still alive), but "I" am still feeling another type of information stream.

---

Finally: It seems neither "me" nor God is a part of the universe (information stream).

Existence Equation:
Existence = "me" + universe (information stream, including my body) + God (author and streamer of information stream/universe)

Question to, and ,favor from, Atheists!!

A Challenge to Atheist Scientists: Design an Intelligent Universe

Since you see there is no design or intelligence—and consequently no designer (God)—put in our universe, I have a request and a question:

---

1. The Request:

Would you please ask a group of the most brilliant atheist scientists in the world to design a really elegant universe that bears "true design" and "high intelligence"? Just do that on a theoretical basis, or do a simulation for it to see how the smart universe works—not the dumb one we live in!

If they succeed, we can use the energy in this universe in designing another smart universe instead of our dumb one!

---

2. The Question:

I wonder, why have our scientists failed until now to completely understand how this stupid, not-designed, dumb universe works? Even now, after about 350 years from the modern scientific revolution and 100 years from special relativity and the photoelectric effect experiment, can't our brilliant scientists know in detail how this dummy, stupid existence—that is not designed at all—works?

---

Have you ever asked yourself this question before?

God, true science, Universe and true religion

Science and Religion: An Integration

True science doesn't contradict true religion; on the contrary, they integrate.

The more you know about the Universe (science), the more you understand the greatness of its Governor. This helps you become more religious—to thank God for making you a part of His Universe. Moreover, researching the Universe more helps you become more religious.

The more you know about God (religion), the more you understand the greatness of His Universe. This helps you become more scientific—to discover and use this wonderful Universe. Moreover, understanding religion more helps you become more scientific.

The design of the universe

George Smoot: Nobel Prize Winner in Physics

George Fitzgerald Smoot III (born February 20, 1945) is an American astrophysicist, cosmologist, and Nobel Prize in Physics laureate, as well as a $1 million TV quiz show prize winner. He won the Nobel Prize in 2006 for his work on COBE with John C. Mather that led to the measurement "...of the black body form and anisotropy of the cosmic microwave background radiation."

This work helped further the Big Bang theory of the universe using the Cosmic Background Explorer Satellite (COBE). According to the Nobel Prize committee, "the COBE project can also be regarded as the starting point for cosmology as a precision science." Smoot donated his share of the Nobel Prize money, less travel costs, to a charitable foundation.

He is a professor of physics at the University of California, Berkeley. In 2003, he was awarded the Einstein Medal.

---

References

1. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c64Aia4XE1Y

2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Smoot

Elements of existence!!

Existence as Information: A Three-Entity Model

I consider existence to be information—nothing else. If I assumed that I have a brain, as they told me, you could make me feel anything you want by stimulating my brain cells in the proper way.

For Me, Existence Has Three Entities:

1. "I" (whatever its meaning)—I who perceive what I think is "in" physically!

2. Stream of Information that "I" feel... you call it the universe!

3. Some Entity who is the source of information and who makes it a streaming projection on "I."

I call this entity GOD.

I am sure that I am not the one who puts this streaming information in front of "I." I have no idea about the information that will come in the next picoseconds, and I am sure that no information is self-circulating! So it must have a source...

Universe & Google !!!

The Google Company Analogy: Why Atheism Is Illogical

When you look around and see everything is in harmony and persistence with time, and it is apparent with some little thinking that the entire universe appears to be governed, I see that any normal, healthy brain should ask: Who is governing that huge system? And who is managing it?

It would be extremely ridiculous if I entered Google company and said, "Mmmm, it seems that Google has no owner or manager!" Then one employee at Google documented how this huge company is running in an amazing way and wrote a huge document that describes this impressive discipline that governs everything within the company.

The employee knows very well that he is just doing documentation. Suddenly, a foolish employee came to him and said, "Oh, you are brilliant! I now understand why we don't see the CEO and manager of the company—because your document is the CEO and manager! Your brilliant document is a genius, so there is no manager or CEO. Yeah! We now know 'the reason' for everything happening in Google, and Google is self-managed by laws in those papers. So why stick to an 'old-fashioned' idea that most low IQ employees are adopting—that there is a manager? Why should we believe in his existence when we haven't seen him?"

"No, no! We are scientists. We know now the 'reason' for everything, and those 'low score' employees are definitely in that miserable state because they think there is a real manager!"

So let them believe that they will be rewarded after the next tornado that is expected to hit the company and destroy it. They are so low IQ... they believe that if they do well at work, not only will they receive a good salary, but they will also get a reward from their claimed "unseen" manager. How miserable they are!

Are You an Atheist? If Yes, Then:

You have convinced yourself that the documentations that described how the universe is governed in the past—this documentation (laws of physics)—have now been promoted to a new position (Governor of the universe's behavior) after you IGNORED the real Governor just because you don't smell Him!

THIS IS CALLED CIRCULAR LOGIC:

"Laws are descriptions of behavior, but they are NOT 'the reason' for the behavior they describe."

Falsification test is not valid for so clear entities:(Too clear to need proof!!)

Examples That Definitely Exist but Are Not Falsifiable

1. Statements of mathematical axioms.

2. Universe (as a whole) existence.

3. One's own existence relative to himself.

4. You are awake, not asleep and dreaming.

So when someone tells me that God is not falsifiable, I can simply tell him I am feeling GOD directly through my soul—it is like your eyes when they see the sun!

The Qur'an as Evidence

Moreover, for those who are not convinced by the non-universality of falsification, God left documentation with Prophet Muhammad, named the Qur'an, that proves itself through its non-human-like way of writing. It challenges the entire world to produce just one chapter (even the shortest) like the chapters of this book, in its unique style of writing that has no common factor with intelligent creatures' way of writing. Moreover, its miraculous relevance to every place and time throughout 1,400 years, its statements of events before they happened, and time itself have proven the truth of the Qur'an.

This book has been signed by GOD. If anyone else had written it, why hasn't He objected? If it was Muhammad who wrote it, why didn't he claim that he is a God (like what Christians believe about Jesus)? So the Qur'an itself is falsifiable, but God is not.

Does God Exist?

Bertrand Russell, although an atheist, in his book,“Why I am not a Christian”, has admitted this fact. He says that the argument centering on design, propounded by theologians to prove the existence of God, is scientifically valid Since ancient days, theologians have argued that when there is a design there must also be a designer. As we see that our world is well designed, it compels us to believe that there is a designer
======
Reference: Does God Exist?
By:Wahiduddin Khan

Strong anthropic principle is really good argument for creation

Strong anthropic principle is really good argument for creation, moreover its refuting trials are not that good.

According to Sir: Martin Rees, there are 6 quantities that are tuned in our universe to adapt life. Epsilon, N, Omega, Lambda, Q and D.
He invented a smart idea to refute creation though these six parameters are tuned for life. He suggested that there are infinite universes that have different combination of these parameters, but it is natural that the only detectable universe is ours because the rest has no life to detect!!
The problem here is that atheists see that detectability and falsifiability is the basis of existence evidence, and they omitted God existence based on them. So what about Sir.Rees? Why does not he apply the two principle on his infinite universes, so he is in contradiction, to avoid God existence he had to assume existence of infinite non detectable unfalsifiable entities!!

God, the absolute reference of existence

To say "Universe exists" without reference, is like to say " A car is moving" without reference, both have no meaning.
Every event in space-time exists with respect to another point in the same space time, but considering all space-time points (Universe) and thought in its existence, we would discover that Universe existence needs a reference, otherwise, it would has no meaning!!. This reference mustn't have any need to any reference for it existence meaning. The existence reference must be independent in its existence of any other existence in the Universe or/and the Universe existence as a whole. This reference must be not inside universe (nor outside it!!) and it gives every thing its existence meaning from referencing it to the reference existence. This reference is GOD, the creator of Universe. No Universe's existence is possible without God, but God's existence is possible without universe!

Is life physical phenomenon?

As Atheism denies the role of soul in life, it considers the life emergence on earth as just physical phenomenon, and they claim that the living organism have all its living from only the physical world and no ingredients from the "metaphysical" world, as they deny the "metaphysical world as whole.
Now assume that we have fed a quantum simulator operating on a quantum computer all single atoms information + (atom-atom) interaction information + boundary conditions and initial condition for the whole system.
Now we have the total human body is macroscopic system, so its epsi function would collapse on merely 1 scenario, so the question now:
Can we use a quantum simulator installed on a quantum computer to know what is the behavior of this human after ,say, 1 hour?!

"God of gaps" is very big myth

"God of gaps" is very big myth for both science and religion.
Let us consider just event A , like falling apple from a tree, when Newton has discovered the mathematical relation between M (earth mass), r (distance from center of earth) and G (gravitational constant) and the rate of change of falling apple momentum. The Question now.. Does Newton provide any explanation of what happened? If you asked him he would say, it Earth attracted the apple but I don't have an idea about "why" it attracted the apple!!

Let us look from another side, if one religious man has the myth of "God of gaps", he would say, God has pulled the apple toward the earth, so I don't need science to tell me the reason of apple fall!!
That's right, but, what would you gain if you know just that God is the reason of every event happens according to his will??!! You have no idea about the description of the action of God in quantitative manner.
So religion give the answer "why" the apple falls down not up, the answer is that this is God's design, but God himself orders people ,in Islam for instance, to explore world to know "how" universe runs based on his willing "why".
==================================
This big myth either at the religious side or scientific side came from misunderstanding the difference between the behavior description (science rule) and the behavior reason (religion rule).
==================================
Conclusively, physics laws is just math documentation of "great will" does whatever it wants in the universe but does it in constant manner to stabilize universe and ease our use for it.

Strong anthropic principle

Strong anthropic principle is really good argument for creation, moreover its refuting trials are not that good. "According to Sir: Martin Rees, there are 6 quantities that are tuned in our universe to adapt life. Epsilon, N, Omega, Lambda, Q and D.
He invented a smart idea to refute creation though these six parameters are tuned for life. He suggested that there are infinite universes that have different combination of these parameters, but it is natural that the only detectable universe is ours because the rest has no life to detect!!
The problem here is that atheists see that detectability and falsifiability is the basis of existence evidence, and they omitted God existence based on them. So what about Sir.Rees? Why does not he apply the two principle on his infinite universes, so he is in contradiction, to avoid God existence he had to assume existence of infinite non detectable unfalsifiable entities!!"

Moreover, taking into account the hypothesis of God versus of infinite number of universes, we find that they equal from being not falsifiable, but the hypothesis of God much more satisfactory for Occam's razor than the multiple universe.

Actually what is more important that the same argument which is taken against theists when taking about God existence, namely, falsifiability, is used to reject God existence, it is double standard logic.

Conclusion:
1-Strong Anthropic Principle is a very strong sign for design argument.
2-Universe is created and made suitable for intelligent life to live in.

Qur'an: 31:20 " Do ye not see that Allah has subjected to your (use) all things in the heavens and on earth, and has made his bounties flow to you in exceeding measure, (both) seen and unseen? Yet there are among men those who dispute about Allah, without knowledge and without guidance, and without a Book to enlighten them! "

GOD existence is of an axiomatic nature

GOD existence is of an axiomatic nature. I feel flood of information every second by my consciousness, I asked myself, since I am not neither the creator nor the exhibitor of this information flood, then, there must be a great creator for this continuous stream of information and also exhibit it by certain rate on my consciousness!!